Michigan Appeals Court Blocks Jan. 15 Primary
State Court Of Appeals Ruling Leaves Campaign Calendar In Flux
http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2007/11/16/politics/main3516521.shtml
"(AP) The Michigan Court of Appeals on Friday upheld a lower court's ruling that the Jan. 15 presidential primary law is unconstitutional.
State GOP Chairman Saul Anuzis said after the ruling was released that it's up to Democrats to act.
"Right now, the only thing standing between a presidential primary and voters is the Democrat (sic) Caucus in the Michigan House of Representatives," he said in a statement. "There is strong bipartisan support for a presidential primary on January 15, but time is running out.""
Decision -http://courtofappeals.mijud.net/documents/OPINIONS/FINAL/COA/20071116_C281814_31_281814.OPN.PDF
or http://preview.tinyurl.com/387p8z
Opinion - Dissenting (WCW)http://courtofappeals.mijud.net/documents/OPINIONS/FINAL/COA/20071116_C281814_32_281814D.OPN.PDF
or http://preview.tinyurl.com/37q5ry
Two issues of concern quickly come to my mind.
#1
Why can't we put our Primary back where it was? That would be too easy I suppose. If the whole idea of a Jan. 15 Primary was to supposedly prevent disenfranchisement of Michigan voters, why then is virtually complete disenfranchisement in a Caucus instead of a Primary the solution? Am I missing the point here or have I hit the nail squarely on it's head?
#2
Also, does the statement or a potential mis-quotation of Saul Anuzis about a "Democratic Caucus" muddy the issue of having a Michigan Primary Election (at all, whenever) instead of a Convention or a Caucus to select the Primary Candidate for both Republican and Democratic parties?
For Liberty!
Steve
read more digg story